Skip to content

Where I stand

Equal Enforcement of the Law

The test of a Sheriff is simple: does the law mean the same thing for everyone, or does it bend for the connected?

In Dane County, we just watched it bend. A judge found probable cause that Ridglan Farms was committing felony animal cruelty. State inspectors documented 311 violations. The facility settled and surrendered its license. It was never criminally charged.

The people who exposed that cruelty face felonies. The Sheriff’s office referred sixty-two people, thirty-three felony burglary counts, for nonviolent rescues; by July 2026, prosecutors had charged fifty-one of them. The one man who actually committed violence against people that day, who slashed tires, slammed car doors into people, and drove his truck into activists on video, was referred only for reckless driving and criminal damage, and three months later has not been charged with anything. Driving a truck into a crowd is not “reckless driving.” A referral that took it seriously would have put reckless endangerment and assault on the table.

And the Sheriff held that up as proof of the office’s “fair and impartial application of the law,” describing the man only as “a nearby neighbor who tried to intervene with the activists,” never disclosing that the “neighbor” is the facility owner’s son-in-law and a town constable. Those facts go to the heart of any claim of impartiality.

Felonies for the people who exposed the abuse. A pass for the abuser. A pass for the man who drove into a crowd. That is not law enforcement. That is taking sides.

As Sheriff, I will:

Equal justice is not a slogan. It is the job.

Sources